A. STYLING-WRITING

Very Weak

Weak

Moderate

Good

Very Good

1. Appropriateness of the article to the journal

2. Clarity of the title and its conformity with the content

3. Appropriateness of the abstract with the purpose and content of the article

4. Convenience of keywords with the content

5. Existence of a scientific method appropriate with the language used by the author

B. CONTENT

1. Originality of the article and its contribution to the academic literature

2. Stickness of the article with scientific ethics

3. Sufficiency of the research for the topic analysis

4. Presentation of the topic in an organized, clear and understable way

5. Identification of theoretical framework and research methods

6. Datas and research methods’ conformity with the purpose of the article

7. Existence of scientific analyses between causes and results

8. Appropriateness of results with purpose and content of the research

9. Sufficiency of literature review and bibliography for the research

EVALUATION OUTCOME

Can be published without any revision and corrections

Can be published only after necessary corrections proposed by the reviewer

Can not be published.

Revised version

a. I want to have a look at it.

b. There is no need to see it.

REVIEWER INFORMATION

Title:

SIGNATURE

(There is no need to sign

in case the form is sent via email)

Name-Surname:

Tel:(Landline/Mobile)

E-mail:

Date: